Comparison
Every product in this space solves a real problem. Most of them solve a different one from ours, and a couple of them are free. Here is the honest map.
Per-user provisioning, auto-install, SCIM groups, private marketplaces
Where we differ
Claude only, and only on a Team or Enterprise subscription. Nothing for Cursor, Codex, Gemini, Bedrock, Vertex or Foundry.
Pick them instead if
Everyone is on Claude Code, on a Claude subscription, and staying there.
Copying a folder of skills into a long list of clients, for nothing
Where we differ
Sync without governance. No groups, no owners, no approvals, no audit, and no way to give a contractor a subset.
Pick them instead if
Everyone should have everything and nobody needs to know when it changed.
Real versioning, free, already in your stack
Where we differ
It works until the person with the knowledge does not use git. Then it silently stops being the source of truth.
Pick them instead if
Every author is an engineer and you are happy managing entitlement with repo permissions.
Proxying MCP traffic, quotas, key management at runtime
Where we differ
Adjacent, not overlapping. They sit in the request path; we hand you config and get out of the way. Neither one distributes skills.
Pick them instead if
Your problem is runtime traffic control, not distribution.
Discovery, inspection, DLP, blocking — a CISO purchase
Where we differ
Complementary. They tell you what is running and stop bad traffic. We decide who is entitled to what and keep the version history.
Pick them instead if
You need to prove control to a security team, not publish to one.
The short version
Copying files to thirty-two clients is a solved problem and several people give it away. If we ever compete on sync alone we have already lost, and we know it.
What Skill Belt sells is who gets what and who changed it, delivered to whichever agent each person actually opens. Everything on the pricing page is priced against those two sentences.
If your whole team is on one agent and one vendor plan, use the console you already pay for. If everyone should have everything, use a free sync tool. If every author writes git commits, use a repository. Better to find that out here than in month three.
As of September 2026, no. MintMCP, MCP Manager, Operant and TrueFoundry are all sales-gated, and Shared Context makes you create an account before you see a number. That is the gap we are aiming at.
No, and we are not going to become one. Sitting in the request path between an agent and a model is a different product with different uptime obligations, and there are good ones already.
$99 a month for up to 50 people, cancelled from the billing page. If you've got a question first, ask it — a person answers.